Ride-hailing, on average, costs about $3 per mile currently.
Industry watchers are hopeful that self-driving cars can bring that down by removing the drivers.
However, low utilization rates and expensive software might make that tricky to make happen in reality.
Automakers like GM and Ford are banking on the the assumption that if they can lower the cost per mile of self-driving taxis to $1 or less, demand will skyrocket. But a new analysis in the Harvard Business Review suggests their model may be flawed.
Why it matters: Carmakers are tearing apart their traditional businesses — exiting underperforming markets, closing factories and laying off workers — while diverting investment into future mobility technologies. But if self-driving taxi fleets don’t take off as expected, their financial plans could be at risk.
What they’re saying: Ride-hailing costs around $3 per mile today, according to GM, but only accounts for 1% of miles traveled. The driver represents most of that cost. Without a driver, the cost per mile falls to around $1 per mile.
At that point, robotaxis will be so cheap everyone will travel that way — or so the theory goes. It’s all about deploying at scale, as GM Cruise CEO Dan Ammann likes to say.
Yes, but: Authors Ashley Nunes and Kristen Hernandez see it differently. They found the estimated cost per mile of a robotaxi in San Francisco was 3 times higher than the cost of owning an older vehicle. The gap was due to lower utilization rates than carmakers assume. (Current taxis are in use about 50% of the time.) Even if robotaxis had substantially higher utilization rates, the cost of providing remote oversight by humans must be factored in. The only way for robotaxis to be cost competitive with older […]